Is anyone really shocked about the revelations from the
recently released internal memorandum from the National Organization for
Marriage ("NOM")? If you haven’t heard
yet, this formerly confidential memo from 2009 lays out NOM’s national strategy
for fighting same-sex marriage. There’s
nothing in it that we didn’t already suspect, really. Mostly it serves as confirmation that NOM and
its clones are not the grassroots, Church bake-sale folks they’d like us to
think they are. Instead, they’re a
cynical, mean-spirited bunch of cultural manipulators who don’t give a toss
about perpetuating wholesomeness and community-mindedness. If there is anything
that stands out about the memo, beyond what we already knew, it’s that they say
this stuff out loud to one another and then put a price tag on it. Bigotry looks especially weird all written in
a peppy memo.
The part of the document that’s gotten the most media
attention is entitled "Not a Civil Rights Project," which is NOM’s strategy for
"fanning the hostility" between the LGBT and African-American communities. The
idea is that LGBT leaders will then be compelled to react negatively to
anti-gay rhetoric by African-American leaders, and will thus be viewed
universally as bigots. In other words,
they want a good old-fashioned race war.
Even African-American leaders who oppose same-sex marriage are, not
surprisingly, declining the invitation.
Another portion of the memo that’s gotten a lot of play, one
that also plays the race card from a stacked deck, describes NOM’s plan to
present opposition to gay marriage as a badge of Latino pride and to encourage
youth rebellion against "conformist assimilation" into the dominant
culture. I’m picturing NOM founder,
Maggie Gallagher, in her collarless suits and pearls, fomenting youth rebellion
in L.A. and it’s making me giggle.
What you may not have heard is that a year’s worth of
race-bating by NOM in 2010 was projected to cost $2,000,000. And here are some more choice strategies from
the memo: The "Behind Enemy Lines"
project documents how gays have tyrannized those who have spoken out against
gay marriage, with a special focus on states where courts have "imposed gay
marriage" on the citizens. This is a
favorite trope of the religious right nowadays, so stay tuned for a lot
more. You saw it first during the
federal Prop 8 trial when the Yes on 8 folks claimed that they couldn’t get any
witnesses to testify against gay marriage because they were all trembling with
fear of the great gay mob. I know – you’re wondering how you missed that gang
dues notice.
Continuing the big-bad-gays theme, is the "Face of the
Victims" project. Now, this one had me
scratching my head because as much as I like to try to see things from another
side’s perspective, I was absolutely stumped to figure who the victims of
same-sex marriage might be. A straight
couple that lost the neighborhood Xmas decoration contest to the new gays next
door? I’ll give you a few moments to see
if you can figure out who the tragic victims are...
Did you guess Homophobes?
I had no idea, but apparently it takes an enormous emotional toll to
maintain your opposition to same-sex marriage when it becomes legal in your
area. NOM planned to videotape these
stories via a rapid response team, and they were all heartbreaking, I’m
sure. The "rapid response" part is also
intriguing, and makes me wonder what a NOM gay crisis might look like. Do you
spontaneously fall to a crying heap on the golf links because you can’t get the
picture of Ellen DeGeneres out of your head?
NOM also planned to hire a coordinator, at $60,000, whose
sole job description was to find and document the stories of all those
miserable children of LGBT parents.
First, I’d like to know what the hiring criteria are for such a job,
and, second, how’s that’s going. I
suspect that by month six, the coordinator spent most of his or her time
updating Facebook at Starbucks while ostensibly out in the field.
Remember, this is a 2009 document and presumably these
projects actually got started. I dearly hope we get to see the 2010 version and
learn how it all went.
Mostly it serves as confirmation that NOM and its clones are not the grassroots, Church bake-sale folks they’d like us to think they are.